Download Ebook The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship Between Virtue and Violence in Human Evolution
Make no mistake, this book is actually advised for you. Your interest about this The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship Between Virtue And Violence In Human Evolution will be addressed sooner when starting to read. In addition, when you finish this book, you could not only address your curiosity yet also find truth significance. Each sentence has an extremely excellent definition and the choice of word is really extraordinary. The author of this book is extremely an awesome person.
The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship Between Virtue and Violence in Human Evolution
Download Ebook The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship Between Virtue and Violence in Human Evolution
Do you require new reference to accompany your spare time when going to residence? Reviewing a book can be an excellent selection. It could spare your time usefully. Besides, by checking out publication, you could boost your understanding and experience. It is not only the science or social understanding; lots of things can be gotten after reading a book.
Now, we concern provide you the best catalogues of book to open up. The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship Between Virtue And Violence In Human Evolution is among the literary work in this globe in ideal to be checking out product. That's not only this book offers referral, but also it will reveal you the incredible advantages of reviewing a book. Establishing your numerous minds is needed; in addition you are kind of individuals with fantastic inquisitiveness. So, guide is very proper for you.
When starting to check out the The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship Between Virtue And Violence In Human Evolution is in the proper time, it will allow you to alleviate pass the analysis actions. It will certainly be in undergoing the precise analysis style. But many individuals might be puzzled as well as careless of it. Even guide will certainly reveal you the reality of life; it doesn't suggest that you can truly pass the process as clear. It is to actually supply the presented book that can be one of referred books to check out. So, having the link of the book to see for you is extremely joyful.
Many individuals who achieve success and also smart have great analysis behavior. Also their reading materials are different. When you are diligent adequate to do checking out on a daily basis, also couple of mins in your leisure, your success and eminence will establish. The people who are taking a look at you might be admired regarding what you do. It will give bit confidence to boost. So, when you have no suggestion regarding exactly what to do in your leisure time currently, allow's examine to the link to get the The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship Between Virtue And Violence In Human Evolution and review it quicker.
Review
“Highly original . . . complex and ambitious . . . A story about the origins of morality that begins” hundreds of thousands of years before any creature had a sense of right and wrong, or even a sense of self . . . There is something impressive, even moving, about the book’s sifting, weighing, and fitting together of evidence from a half-dozen continents, a dozen disciplines, several dozen species, and two million years into a large and intricate structure. There is also a lesson: evolution is much less relevant to our growth than moral imagination.—George Scialabba, The New Yorker“Wrangham probes the deep evolutionary history of human aggression . . . this book [is] essential reading as geneticists start to unwrap the package of genes that responded to domestication, which may give hints about our own evolutionary history.”—The Wall Street Journal“Fascinating . . . The Goodness Paradox pieces together findings from anthropology, history, and biology to reconstruct a vivid and comprehensive history of how humans evolved into domesticated creatures . . . presents a complex but convincing perspective on how good and evil may have come to co-exist in our unique species.”—The Washington Post“[Wrangham] deploys fascinating facts of natural history and genetics as he enters a debate staked out centuries ago by Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (among other philosophers), and still very much alive today: how to understand the conjunction of fierce aggression and cooperative behavior in humans . . . This latest version[of human evolution] is bound to provoke controversy, but that’s what bold theorizing is supposed to do. And Wrangham is nothing if not bold as he puts the paradox in his title to use. In his telling, the dark side of protohuman nature was enlisted in the evolution of communal harmony . . . Wrangham has highlighted a puzzle at the core of human evolution, and delivered a reminder of the double-edged nature of our virtues and vices.”—The Atlantic“A work accessible to those outside the scientific field, offering a great deal of information.”—Library Journal“Based on Richard Wrangham’s path-breaking work and on many riveting examples, this magnificent and profound book shows how our violent, even murderous, impulses actually shaped our species to be kind and cooperative, progressively shaping our evolutionary trajectory, our moral expectations, and our genes.” —Nicholas A. Christakis, Sterling Professor of Social and Natural Science, Yale University “A brilliant analysis of the role of aggression in our evolutionary history.” —Jane Goodall, author of In the Shadow of Man “Richard Wrangham has written a brilliant and honest book about humanity’s central contradiction: that we are capable of mass murder but live in societies with almost no violence. No other species straddles such a wide gap, and the reasons are staggeringly obvious once Wrangham lays them out in his calm, learned prose. This book is science writing at its best: lucid, rational and yet deeply concerned with humanity.”—Sebastian Junger, author of Tribe“Wrangham has been the most original and influential interpreter of ecological and evolutionary factors in the origin of our species. In The Goodness Paradox he extends his evidence and reasoning into yet another fundamental human trait.” —Edward O. Wilson, University Research Professor Emeritus, Harvard University “Nobody knows more, thinks deeper, or writes better about the evolution of modern human beings than Richard Wrangham. Here he reveals a rich and satisfying story about the self-domestication of our species, drawing upon remarkable observations and experiments.” —Matt Ridley, author of The Evolution of Everything “In this revolutionary, illuminating, and dazzling book, Wrangham provides the first compelling explanation for how and why humans can be so cooperative, kind, and compassionate, yet simultaneously so brutal, aggressive, and cruel. His brilliant self-domestication hypothesis will transform your views of what it means to be human.” —Daniel E. Lieberman, author of The Story of the Human Body “This will prove to be one of the most important publications of our time. Fully supported scientific information from many directions leads us to a new and compelling analysis of our evolutionary history. Every page is fascinating, every revelation is unforgettable. It will change how we see ourselves, our past, and our future.” —Elizabeth Marshall Thomas, author of The Hidden Life of Dogs “This is the most thought-provoking book I have read in years. In clear, elegant prose, drawing on riveting data and vivid scenes gathered from species all over the world, renowned anthropologist Richard Wrangham examines the issues most central to human morality. The Goodness Paradox is a breakthrough that deserves careful reading, thoughtful consideration, and lively debate among all those who care about our evolutionary history and the future of human morality.” —Sy Montgomery, author of How to Be a Good Creature
Read more
About the Author
RICHARD WRANGHAM is Ruth B. Moore Professor of Biological Anthropology, Harvard University. He is the author of Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human and Demonic Males: Apes and the Origins of Human Violence (with Dale Peterson). Wrangham has studied wild chimpanzees in Uganda since 1987. He has received a MacArthur Foundation fellowship and is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and of the British Academy.
Read more
See all Editorial Reviews
Product details
Hardcover: 400 pages
Publisher: Pantheon (January 29, 2019)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1101870907
ISBN-13: 978-1101870907
Product Dimensions:
6.7 x 1.3 x 9.6 inches
Shipping Weight: 1.6 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review:
4.1 out of 5 stars
8 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#9,635 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Richard Wrangham is a soulful and feminist evolutionary anthropologist. This book puts together insights from a lifetime of studying chimpanzees, bonobos and humans, observing the normative aggression, especially of males toward females. His "Demonic Males" and "Sexual Coercion in Humans and Primates" made clear that men who beat women are following an agenda that goes far back into evolutionary history. Domestic violence is intended to maintain power rather than because of low self-esteem from being unloving. This is important because women often return to their abuser hoping that their love will change him.In his new book Wrangham grapples with a fundamental questions about human nature; are we basically good or evil? He concludes that we both one of the most altruistic and the most evil species because of different selection pressures on aggression within one's group and between groups. Wrangham is an evocative story teller and this book is a page turner. This is a radical and well-supported view, that should change how we see ourselves and our societies.
I gave this book 4 stars because I admire the author's ambitious efforts to use an evolutionary perspective to tackle fundamental questions about human behavior from the beginnings of our species to modern societies. The "Goodness Paradox" of the title refers to humans' inherent tendencies to behave in cooperative (and sometimes very altruistic) ways vs. participating in organized forms of violence toward others outside their communities. Recorded human history has seen almost incessant warfare in various forms, and even most hunter-gatherer communities seem to also have engaged in high levels of warfare. On the other hand, we have advanced our culture and knowledge while generally controlling criminal and anti-social activities. Professor Wrangham explains this paradox with an innovative "Self-Domestication" theory. As I understand this, humans first emerged 300,000 years ago in Africa as a separate species equipped with the ability, unlike chimpanzees, to co-exist and cooperate (with low levels of aggression) within tribal groups, while able to be effective hunters and killers of animals and competitors. Various means were used to control anti-social behavior, most notably killing the most aggressive offenders within the group or tribe. However, this theory leaves me unconvinced because some important questions remain unanswered:1) Why did it take Homo sapiens 200,000 years to be able to travel out of Africa, and to colonize the world while successfully competing against other human species (Neanderthals), who were larger, stronger, and better adapted to colder climates? Evolution must have provided modern humans (perhaps at several points in time) with important improved intellectual abilities involving language and cognitive skills. Do we know with any certainty how these biological advances affected human behavior, including cooperation and violence?2) If we are inherently less aggressive within our own communities because of 300,000 years of "self-domestication," then why do most modern societies need a heavily armed police force, plus extensive laws & criminal justice systems? Capital punishment has been used frequently in human history until the last century to punish violent criminals, but we still have violent crime today. As a thought experiment, imagine what would happen if our police force went on strike for a month.3) Even if we accept the premise that humans are less aggressive within their own communities, does this really matter if we continue killing each other in wars without end? The author's visit to Auschwitz is described at the end of the book, as he contemplates the horrors of WW2. Are we really confident that this scale of killing will not happen again?Despite my questions about his theory, I think that the author does offer an important message that we do have free will, and choices about our behavior, and that we need to make conscious efforts as a society to reduce organized violence. I hope that this book will help in this cause.
The paradox is that people can be incredibly peaceful and incredibly violent--sometimes the same people at different times. Wrangham notes the case of Scandinavia--from medieval Vikings to modern super-peaceful and orderly societies--and Rwanda--from peace to killing 10% of the population in 100 days, and then back to peace. Wrangham's explanation is that good and evil come, in part, from the same thing: the human ability to form coalitions to use violence to stop violence. He is an expert on chimpanzee aggression. Chimps are far more aggressive against their own kind than humans (or almost any other animal, for that matter). Why are humans different? Wrangham draws on a vast amount of ethnography to show that human societies routinely execute extremely bad actors--though he argues, strongly, that the death penalty has served its purpose and should be abandoned now. I am familiar with the ethnographic sources, and can confirm that most societies handle psychopaths and similar bad actors in a pretty final way, though often only when they have done a lot of damage. Common is a story in which four men go out hunting, three come back, and no one asks any questions. The problems with this as an explanation for human nonviolence are that 1) killing the violent is also violent, so just keeps the ball rolling, 2) the violent people often leave a lot of children before being rubbed out, and 3) Wrangham carefully and correctly notes that nonconformists are at least as likely to be executed as violent persons, leading to conformity rather than peace; often it's the evilly violent that kill the meek, mild nonconformists (as in the Salem witch trials--which he mentions). Thus, as a full explanation of human cooperation and nonviolence, execution does not make the grade. However, combined with other selective forces that made us more and more social and cooperative over time, it seems a valuable thing to emphasize.Wrangham sees us as "self-domesticated." To me, as a specialist in ethnobiology (including domestication and the origins of agriculture), domestication refers to deliberate selection by humans, changing the genetics of the species in question from anything natural. By this standard, humans are somewhat domesticated, but not up there with dogs. Wrangham (in a particularly good discussion of domestication) notes that domestication routinely produces floppy ears, white spots, and other characteristic features we do not have; we do, however, have rather tame behavior, short jaws and crowded teeth, round smooth skulls, and other standard physical sequelae of domestication. And our behavior is more tranquil than a chimp's, but far less tranquil than a dog's or sheep's. So, we are a bit domestic, but not fully domesticated.As someone with fair knowledge of such matters, I find this book both underestimates and overestimates human violence. Wrangham has not dealt with the full level of horror that hatred can bring about, in genocide and war, or with the constant low-level nastiness, spitefulness, and malignancy that feed into individual violence and murder. On the other hand, he has not dealt adequately with the levels of civility and peace that some societies maintain. The result of this is that he thinks in terms of average societies--especially the traditional ones, in which murder and local war are more common than in most modern states. This allows him to reduce the problem to one of violence handled by violent coalitions, and thus to a genetically guided, highly biological process. The reality is that humans swing dramatically from insane outbreaks of murder to total peace (my wife and I have studied this in Rwanda and Cambodia). Simple biology cannot explain this; we have to look at other factors, both innate and learned. In particular, we need to look much more at the cultural construction of the fight-flight-freeze response innate in all higher animals. Wrangham has made a good start, but psychology and cultural anthropology will have to weigh in to bring this start to fruition.
The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship Between Virtue and Violence in Human Evolution PDF
The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship Between Virtue and Violence in Human Evolution EPub
The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship Between Virtue and Violence in Human Evolution Doc
The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship Between Virtue and Violence in Human Evolution iBooks
The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship Between Virtue and Violence in Human Evolution rtf
The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship Between Virtue and Violence in Human Evolution Mobipocket
The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship Between Virtue and Violence in Human Evolution Kindle
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar